In February 2014, a diverse group of Minnesota leaders began a collaborative process to define Minnesota’s 21st century energy system. The goal is to identify a new regulatory environment that will resolve the fundamental misalignment between the traditional utility model, technology advancements, and public policy goals. e21 participants recently completed Phase I of the effort by developing several recommendations that, if adopted, would offer customers more choices on how and where their energy is produced and reward utilities for the achievement of agreed-upon performance goals.

• Participants included representatives from utility, consumer advocate, energy technology, business, environmental, academic, and government organizations
• The new regulatory framework recommendations fall into four categories: performance-based rate-making, customer option and rate design reforms, planning reforms, and regulatory process reforms
  • Utilities would operate in an environment that emphasizes providing energy services and options that align with customer expectations (energy efficiency, renewables, distributed generation, etc.) rather than on the volume of electricity sold
  • The framework would require collaboration between all stakeholder entities and leverages an integrated resource analysis rather than an Integrated Resource Plan
  • The framework would enable both state and federal policy goals to be met AND ensure that utilities have a viable business model
  • Rate-making processes would change significantly. The strict accounting cost of service approach would be eliminated in favor of a performance-based, forward-looking framework. This would take the form of a business plan that aligns with metrics, policy goals, and technology advancements, ultimately taking into account what should be paid to achieve the outcomes wanted by society
• Phase II of the initiative will focus on defining the details of the Phase I recommendations
  • Unanswered questions raised during Phase I must be addressed (e.g., how to best modernize Minnesota’s electric grid)
  • Additional participants will be brought on to assist with Phase II, including those directly impacted by the recommendations who did not participate in Phase I
  • The implementation timeline has not yet been completely developed